Evolution Is More Than A Theory
65
EVOLUTION IS MORE THAN A THEORY IT IS A CONSPIRACY AND HOAX
You read that correctly. Evolution is more than a theory it is a conspiracy and hoax. Bigger even than the global warming hoax of late. If scientist say it does it make it science? In an argument, is the loudest voice right? The answer to both of those questions is obviously no. But that is what is happening in the evolution vs creation debate. Have you heard the classic tale of the Emperor's New Clothes? Evolution is the classic example.
This is an opinion article and not a technical article so I will be drawing conclusions and making statements that are unsubstantiated here but with some Googling it is not hard to find supportive material. Science is defined by dictionary.com as:
Systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation.
Evolution cannot be observed only some mutations. It cannot be produced or reproduced by experimentation. Yet scientist in spite of this make unsubstantiated explanations every time previously thought beliefs turn out to be false. There used to talk about missing links between species. They got tired of hunting for the missing links so they offered again the unsubstantiated idea that there are "shades" or a blending between species. If scientist say it does it make it science? That is acceptable for a theory but a true scientist would not teach it as fact until proven. Yet they do and people believe it because it is in text books and scientist say so. That is done in virtually every discipline of science. They have done it in physics with an explanation of the laws of thermodynamics. If people want to believe evolutionthat is their prerogative but for scientist to teach as fact their unverifiable explanations should be unacceptable. This fits into the category of dictionary.com's definition of a conspiracy theory which it defines as:
A theory that explains an event as being the result of a plot by a covert group or organization; a belief that a particular unexplained event was caused by such a group.
I say it is a plot because the scientist, in spite of the inability to produce by scientific methods real evolution, have sometimes knowingly and sometimes otherwise conspired with educators, politician and even religious figures to propagate their beliefs. They have connived to get it taught as fact in all public text books and in an ever increasing number of Christian college text books and curriculum. Politicians and religious figures either have been duped into acceptance or as the movie Expelled depicted they are afraid to speak their true beliefs i.e the reference to the Emperor's New Clothes. During the 2008 presidential primary campaign someone was quoted as saying speaking of Mike Huckabee, "Would you want a president that doesn't believe in evolution?" I had a speech teacher in college who said, "Evolution just makes my god that much bigger." It doesn't make my God that much bigger it makes him a liar.
I stated in the beginning that evolution is a hoax which is defined as: something intended to deceive or defraud because scientist, who in all areas except evolution, demand strict adherence to verifiable evidence before claiming fact. It is imperative that they deceive and defraud to propagate their atheistic beliefs because they have no other method to deny diety. Is that acceptable behavior for respected professionals? Hense one of my original questions that if scientist say it does it make it science? Many scoff at the term creation science while all the while endorsing evolution as science. They are both belief systems. Ken Ham says it best at the entrance to the Creation Museum. Both sides of the debate just start from a different point of reference. Evolution in some form has been around since at least the mid nineteenth century. That is quite a long time and still no verifiable evidence yet it is still claimed to be science. What is truly amazing is in spite of the conspiracy and hoax according to a 2009 Gallup poll only 39 percent of Americans believe in evolution. Why is that? I believe it is because born in all of us is a belief of a god of some kind. Belief in evolution is not a natural "instinct" it must be taught and indoctrinated. That is why they shout it so loudly. Does the loudest voice in a debate make them the winner. Of course not.
- Weighty Words
It is always good, ethical and proper to give credit where credit is due. However, that is not always possible because the gravity of the words may be delayed. And this article is case in point. I was watching Fox and Friends one morning and they... - 3 weeks ago
- Why is conservatism a dirty word
Conservatism is a nine letter word if my elementary math is correct not a four letter word. Yet it seems to be treated by many on the political left as such. The definition of conservatism according to dictionary.com is "the disposition to preserve... - 5 weeks ago
- I'm Glad I Served
This article may not seem totally coherent but that is because I still struggle with some things in my mind. I am a veteran of the USAF (United States Air Force). I served from 1971-1975. However it has just been in the last couple of years that I... - 4 months ago
CommentsLoading...
EXACTLY!
You are not distinguishing between theory and hypothesis. It is a hypothesis that is tested; it is discarded if the test fails, if it succeeds, it becomes a theory. Hypotheses come in 2 flavors: "if evolution is true, then this will happen" (success is it happening) and "if evolution is not true, then this will happen" (success is it not happening). Thousands of hypotheses about evolution have been tested with success which is what made it a theory. Not a single hypothesis endorsing evolution has failed, for it would only take one.
I can never think of examples when I need them...ok, how about this example: if evolution is true, if complexity in living organisms developed over time, then it is hypothesized that the farther down you dig, the simpler the creatures that will be found in the fossil record. Voila! That one turns out to be correct! It has never been not true...without credible evidence that the layers have been mixed.
I can't come up with any hypotheses from creation science. Creation science by definition does not lend itself to "systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation".
If one is a true Christian, Why do we give credence or even a second of our time thinking or writing about these false theories and doctorines by scientists. Either God is God and what is written in the Holy Bible is fact, or it is all just a nice novel.
Brother Dave.
It is good to write this out, so that more people are aware of what Christians believe.
"This is an opinion article and not a technical article so I will be drawing conclusions and making statements that are unsubstantiated here but with some Googling it is not hard to find supportive material."
-Yes, with a little Googling it's not hard to find supportive material for either view. Here's one from the National Academy of Sciences. (Thoses "scientists" you speak of).
Science and Creationism : a View from the National Academy of Sciences 1999
http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=6024&pag
"There used to talk about missing links between species. They got tired of hunting for the missing links so they offered again the unsubstantiated idea that there are "shades" or a blending between species."
-According to the National Academy of Sciences article (above) and this Wikipedia article; you can read the scientific evidence about this for yourself..online....right now. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_common_descent
"Many scoff at the term creation science while all the while endorsing evolution as science. They are both belief systems. "
-The Supreme Court heard evidence by creationists and evolutionists. The court ruled that Creationism is not a science. It is a religious belief. You can read about it here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwards_v._Aguillard
-Here's another article from Wikipedia that describes the history of this debate.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation–evolution_controversy
"Evolution is more than a theory it is a conspiracy and hoax."
-Google has more than a dozen writers saying that evolution is a conspiracy. Does that make it so?
-Google also offers 146 million articles about evolution. Does that make it so?
"...according to a 2004 CBS poll the majority of Americans still believe in creation? There is a reason for that."
JMHO..the majority of Americans call themselves christians.
Unfotunately, another poll done by a christian organization says there's no difference in behavior between American non-believers and American christians.
There's a reason for that too.
Just between me and you, Dave. I think christians (including me) have gotten so wrapped up in correct belief that our lifestyle has slipped. Our imitation of Christ is practically non-existant.
You have one hundred red and one hundred blue.. all the red die, and the blue survive... Eventually there are a thousand blue, and some have become green. The blue decline, and the green grow. There are a hundred blue and a hundred green.. All the blue die and the green survive...
This is evolution... Simplified, of course...
But who says evolution denies God? The Bible never says how God does what He does. We just assume He says something and it exists.














Michael Adams1959 Level 2 Commenter 19 months ago
Excellent work, I especially like the last paragraph, it is indoctrinated into people. Great hub!