Evolution Is More Than A Theory

65

By Dave Sibole

Public Domain Galaxy Pic
Public Domain Galaxy Pic

EVOLUTION IS MORE THAN A THEORY IT IS A CONSPIRACY AND HOAX

You read that correctly. Evolution is more than a theory it is a conspiracy and hoax. Bigger even than the global warming hoax of late. If scientist say it does it make it science? In an argument, is the loudest voice right? The answer to both of those questions is obviously no. But that is what is happening in the evolution vs creation debate. Have you heard the classic tale of the Emperor's New Clothes? Evolution is the classic example.

This is an opinion article and not a technical article so I will be drawing conclusions and making statements that are unsubstantiated here but with some Googling it is not hard to find supportive material. Science is defined by dictionary.com as:

Systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation.

Evolution cannot be observed only some mutations. It cannot be produced or reproduced by experimentation. Yet scientist in spite of this make unsubstantiated explanations every time previously thought beliefs turn out to be false. There used to talk about missing links between species. They got tired of hunting for the missing links so they offered again the unsubstantiated idea that there are "shades" or a blending between species. If scientist say it does it make it science? That is acceptable for a theory but a true scientist would not teach it as fact until proven. Yet they do and people believe it because it is in text books and scientist say so. That is done in virtually every discipline of science. They have done it in physics with an explanation of the laws of thermodynamics. If people want to believe evolutionthat is their prerogative but for scientist to teach as fact their unverifiable explanations should be unacceptable. This fits into the category of dictionary.com's definition of a conspiracy theory which it defines as:

A theory that explains an event as being the result of a plot by a covert group or organization; a belief that a particular unexplained event was caused by such a group.

I say it is a plot because the scientist, in spite of the inability to produce by scientific methods real evolution, have sometimes knowingly and sometimes otherwise conspired with educators, politician and even religious figures to propagate their beliefs. They have connived to get it taught as fact in all public text books and in an ever increasing number of Christian college text books and curriculum. Politicians and religious figures either have been duped into acceptance or as the movie Expelled depicted they are afraid to speak their true beliefs i.e the reference to the Emperor's New Clothes. During the 2008 presidential primary campaign someone was quoted as saying speaking of Mike Huckabee, "Would you want a president that doesn't believe in evolution?" I had a speech teacher in college who said, "Evolution just makes my god that much bigger." It doesn't make my God that much bigger it makes him a liar.

I stated in the beginning that evolution is a hoax which is defined as: something intended to deceive or defraud because scientist, who in all areas except evolution, demand strict adherence to verifiable evidence before claiming fact. It is imperative that they deceive and defraud to propagate their atheistic beliefs because they have no other method to deny diety. Is that acceptable behavior for respected professionals? Hense one of my original questions that if scientist say it does it make it science? Many scoff at the term creation science while all the while endorsing evolution as science. They are both belief systems. Ken Ham says it best at the entrance to the Creation Museum. Both sides of the debate just start from a different point of reference. Evolution in some form has been around since at least the mid nineteenth century. That is quite a long time and still no verifiable evidence yet it is still claimed to be science. What is truly amazing is in spite of the conspiracy and hoax according to a 2009 Gallup poll only 39 percent of Americans believe in evolution. Why is that? I believe it is because born in all of us is a belief of a god of some kind. Belief in evolution is not a natural "instinct" it must be taught and indoctrinated. That is why they shout it so loudly. Does the loudest voice in a debate make them the winner. Of course not.


  • Weighty Words

    It is always good, ethical and proper to give credit where credit is due. However, that is not always possible because the gravity of the words may be delayed. And this article is case in point. I was watching Fox and Friends one morning and they... - 3 weeks ago

  • Why is conservatism a dirty word

    Conservatism is a nine letter word if my elementary math is correct not a four letter word. Yet it seems to be treated by many on the political left as such. The definition of conservatism according to dictionary.com is "the disposition to preserve... - 5 weeks ago

  • I'm Glad I Served

    This article may not seem totally coherent but that is because I still struggle with some things in my mind. I am a veteran of the USAF (United States Air Force). I served from 1971-1975. However it has just been in the last couple of years that I... - 4 months ago

Comments

Michael Adams1959 profile image

Michael Adams1959 Level 2 Commenter 19 months ago

Excellent work, I especially like the last paragraph, it is indoctrinated into people. Great hub!

Dave Sibole profile image

Dave Sibole Hub Author 19 months ago

Thanks Michael I don't really expect all of the comment to be so approving but I think it is time for the 39% to start questioning more loudly. I think it is time for the professionals to put up or shut up or put evolution in the same category as creation-a belief system.

Michael Adams1959 profile image

Michael Adams1959 Level 2 Commenter 19 months ago

EXACTLY!

DyNama 19 months ago

You are not distinguishing between theory and hypothesis. It is a hypothesis that is tested; it is discarded if the test fails, if it succeeds, it becomes a theory. Hypotheses come in 2 flavors: "if evolution is true, then this will happen" (success is it happening) and "if evolution is not true, then this will happen" (success is it not happening). Thousands of hypotheses about evolution have been tested with success which is what made it a theory. Not a single hypothesis endorsing evolution has failed, for it would only take one.

I can never think of examples when I need them...ok, how about this example: if evolution is true, if complexity in living organisms developed over time, then it is hypothesized that the farther down you dig, the simpler the creatures that will be found in the fossil record. Voila! That one turns out to be correct! It has never been not true...without credible evidence that the layers have been mixed.

I can't come up with any hypotheses from creation science. Creation science by definition does not lend itself to "systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation".

Dave Sibole profile image

Dave Sibole Hub Author 19 months ago

Thank you Dynama for the comment and opinion. Evolutionist continue to explain away and develop new explanation as in the cited case of evolving from one species to another. They have no more proof for the new explanation than the first just different. If either of those were true they surely could have found evidence by now. Every scientific discovery goes through that phase but never until evolution was it dissiminated as truth. I say show me the proof or acknowledge it is a belief system not science. They use some scientic methods to test some of their ideas but none of it has proven anything definitively. There are creation scientist as well but they get discredited even though they use scientific methods and have credentials rivaling any evolutionist. No one questions gravity or the earth is round. They have been proven. They are true, they are fact. I want them to quit trying to out shout creationist. Show me the proof. It is not fact because a scientist says it is science. Show me the proof.

Dave Mathews profile image

Dave Mathews Level 7 Commenter 19 months ago

If one is a true Christian, Why do we give credence or even a second of our time thinking or writing about these false theories and doctorines by scientists. Either God is God and what is written in the Holy Bible is fact, or it is all just a nice novel.

Brother Dave.

Dave Sibole profile image

Dave Sibole Hub Author 19 months ago

Thanks for your comment and visit Brother Dave. Our silence is what has given them the boldness to assert their agenda over us and our public education system. When I was taking Biology 101 in college the professor on the first day walk into class and said we teach evolution here if you want to discuss creation go get another room it will not even be discussed here. I was in my late twenties at the time and most of the students were right out of high school and many of them had no religious background at all. What he was teaching was all they had ever heard so why would they not believe it? They don't even know there is a real explanation for our beginnning.

Ingenira profile image

Ingenira Level 5 Commenter 18 months ago

It is good to write this out, so that more people are aware of what Christians believe.

Dave Sibole profile image

Dave Sibole Hub Author 18 months ago

Agreed Ingenira. Thanks for the visit and comment.

HubCrafter profile image

HubCrafter 18 months ago

"This is an opinion article and not a technical article so I will be drawing conclusions and making statements that are unsubstantiated here but with some Googling it is not hard to find supportive material."

-Yes, with a little Googling it's not hard to find supportive material for either view. Here's one from the National Academy of Sciences. (Thoses "scientists" you speak of).

Science and Creationism : a View from the National Academy of Sciences 1999

http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=6024&pag

"There used to talk about missing links between species. They got tired of hunting for the missing links so they offered again the unsubstantiated idea that there are "shades" or a blending between species."

-According to the National Academy of Sciences article (above) and this Wikipedia article; you can read the scientific evidence about this for yourself..online....right now. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_common_descent

"Many scoff at the term creation science while all the while endorsing evolution as science. They are both belief systems. "

-The Supreme Court heard evidence by creationists and evolutionists. The court ruled that Creationism is not a science. It is a religious belief. You can read about it here.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwards_v._Aguillard

-Here's another article from Wikipedia that describes the history of this debate.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation–evolution_controversy

"Evolution is more than a theory it is a conspiracy and hoax."

-Google has more than a dozen writers saying that evolution is a conspiracy. Does that make it so?

-Google also offers 146 million articles about evolution. Does that make it so?

Dave Sibole profile image

Dave Sibole Hub Author 18 months ago

Thanks for your comment Hubcrafter. I respect your opinion. As for the Supreme Court's decision that creationism is not science. Dictionary.com defines science as systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation. Evolution does not qualify either. Doesn't it seem strange that in spite of academia and the media trying to brainwash people that according to a 2004 CBS poll the majority of Americans still believe in creation? There is a reason for that.

HubCrafter profile image

HubCrafter 18 months ago

"...according to a 2004 CBS poll the majority of Americans still believe in creation? There is a reason for that."

JMHO..the majority of Americans call themselves christians.

Unfotunately, another poll done by a christian organization says there's no difference in behavior between American non-believers and American christians.

There's a reason for that too.

Just between me and you, Dave. I think christians (including me) have gotten so wrapped up in correct belief that our lifestyle has slipped. Our imitation of Christ is practically non-existant.

Dave Sibole profile image

Dave Sibole Hub Author 17 months ago

Our imitation of Christ is practically non-existant

No argument on that from me.

Logic 17 months ago

You have one hundred red and one hundred blue.. all the red die, and the blue survive... Eventually there are a thousand blue, and some have become green. The blue decline, and the green grow. There are a hundred blue and a hundred green.. All the blue die and the green survive...

This is evolution... Simplified, of course...

But who says evolution denies God? The Bible never says how God does what He does. We just assume He says something and it exists.

Dave Sibole profile image

Dave Sibole Hub Author 17 months ago

Thanks for the visit and comment Logic. Genesis says he created it in seven days. That is the way it happened or the Bible itself cannot be trusted. If the Bible cannont be trusted then we have no revelation from God and our faith is baseless and just a figment of our imagination.

It takes a great imagination to believe in evolution. It defies all the laws of probability so much so that it is laughable.

If God used evolution as a means of creation at what point in the process does humans obtain a soul?

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Christmas is coming

    Kindle Keyboard, Wi-Fi, 6" E Ink Display
    Amazon Price: $139.00
    Kindle Keyboard 3G, Free 3G + Wi-Fi, 6" E Ink Display
    Amazon Price: $189.00
    In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood (8th Edition)
    Review The single most useful resource I know of on origins, bar none Dr. Kent Davey, Senior Research Scientist, University of Texas --Dr. Kent Davey, University of Texas, Senior Research Scientist Brown hydroplate theory directly challenges the current plate tectonics model and suggests a major revamping of geological events --Chalcedon Report The most complete reference book I have encountered on the scientific aspects of origins Dr. Stuart Patterson, former Academic Dean andProfessor of Chemistry, Furman University --Dr. Stuart Patterson, former Academic Dean and Chemistry Professor, Furman University
    Amazon Price: $19.75
    List Price: $29.95
    Please wait working